Janusz Omeluk v. Langsten Slip & Batbyggeri A/s

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adding that court did not analyze 22 reasonableness requirement where first two requirements were not met
• lack of regular place of business significant for general jurisdiction determination
• “The authority of our decision in Shute is questionable. . . . Because of the 16 posture of the Court’s reversal of Shute, it is not clear whether the ‘but for’ test survives.”
• “Mr. Omeluk would have suffered the same injury even if none of the Washington contacts had taken place. His claim was therefore not one which arose out of or resulted from [defendant’s] forum-related activities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).