January v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that deceptive conduct may give rise to scheme liability under Rules 10b-5(a) and (c)
• finding scheme liability where Defendants created an in-house transfer agent to conceal a scheme designed to channel transfer agent cost savings away from the funds
• “[CJourts consistently hold that signatories of misleading documents ‘made’ the statements in those documents, and so face liability under Rule 10b-5(b).”
• [“Defendant’s] position at entities other than the [primary violator] does not demonstrate his control over the misleading statements in the [primary violator’s] SEC filings.”
• “[A] theory of liability premised on treating corporate insiders as a group cannot survive a plain reading of the Janus decision.”
• “[C]ourts consistently hold that signatories of misleading documents ‘made’ the statements in those documents, and so face liability under Rule 10b-5(b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).