Skip to main content
· 9/4/2008

Janssen Pharmaceutica, NV v. Apotex, Inc.

Citations

  • 540 F.3d 1353
  • 88 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1079
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 18822
  • 2008 WL 4068688

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing Hatch- Waxman Act provisions creating potential 180-day period of exclusivity as incentive for first generic manufacturer to file ANDA
  • “We agree with the parties that if Apotex had not stipulated to the validity of the '663 patent, then Caraco would have been controlling.”
  • “We agree with the parties that if Apotex had not stipulated to the validity of the '663 patent, then Caraco would have been controlling.”
  • “The 180[-]day exclusivity period is important to generic pharmaceutical companies as it promotes patent challenges by enabling a generic company a period to recover its investment in these challenges.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michel, Rader, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.