Jann v. Interplastic Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he majority of courts, including this Court, have held that a stay serves no obvious purpose and dismissal is appropriate ‘where the entire controversy between the parties is subject to and will be resolved by arbitration.”’ (collecting cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).