Skip to main content
· 3/21/1994

Janis E. Meredith v. Beech Aircraft Corporation, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus Curiae

Citations

  • 18 F.3d 890
  • 39 Fed. R. Serv. 41
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5338
  • 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,003
  • 64 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 473
  • 1994 WL 88076

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that proof of lawsuit against employer and subsequent termination of employee, without more, did not demonstrate causal connection
  • holding that defendant’s assertions that plaintiff was not promoted because she lacked the interpersonal, leadership, and communication skills necessary for the position were legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for the decision
  • holding that a satisfactory evaluation, without explanation why it might be considered negative evaluation, and without any evidence of adverse action relating to the evaluation, was not actionable adverse employment action
  • holding that judicial notice would be improper because fact that a candidate is most qualified for position is a disputed fact that must be established through the presentation of evidence, and was not a “universal truth”
  • noting that claims dismissed with leave to amend which are 19 not re-alleged in an amended pleading may be “considered waived if not repled.”
  • finding that plaintiff failed to raise inference that a “meets expectations” rating amounted to a negative evaluation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Logan, Brorby, Seay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.