Skip to main content
· 7/22/2004

Janik v. Rudy, Exelrod & Zieff

Citations

  • 14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 751
  • 119 Cal. App. 4th 930

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • an 19 “attorney who undertakes one matter on behalf of a client owes that client the duty to at 20 least consider and advise the client if there are apparent related matters that the client is 21 overlooking and that should be pursued to avoid prejudicing the client’s interests”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pollak

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.