Janiece S. NOLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph Maxwell CLELAND, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that summary judgment was improper on the issue of constructive discharge
• holding that summary judgment was improper on the issue of constructive discharge
• held that evidence of four incidents of differential treatment over two years was sufficient to create a genuine issue of fact for trial
• “Historic discrimination over a number of years [may] provide[ ] the necessary aggravating factor ... to justify a constructive discharge,”
• Title VII is the exclusive remedy for federal employees if the additional claims arise from the same factual predicate as the Title VII claim
• “The holding of Brown, supra, is controlling on this issue and we feel that such holding 24 cannot be circumvented where the factual predicate for [plaintiff]’s due process claim is the 25 discrimination which is the basis of her Title VII claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).