Skip to main content
· 6/27/1985

Janiczek v. Dover Management Co.

Citations

  • 481 N.E.2d 25
  • 134 Ill. App. 3d 543
  • 89 Ill. Dec. 673
  • 1985 Ill. App. LEXIS 2137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to invalidate a complaint filed by a disbarred attorney because doing so would “penalize an innocent party” and “would overlook the fact that the party did secure the services of a licensed attorney to represent him at trial”
  • declining to 8 No. 09-2183 invalidate a complaint filed by a disbarred attorney because doing so would “penalize an innocent party” and “would overlook the fact that the party did secure the services of a licensed attorney to represent him at trial”
  • where an attorney did not notify his client that he had been disbarred and filed a complaint under another attorney’s name, the reviewing court did not apply the nullity rule because its purposes would not be furthered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.