Janice Washington v. City of St. Louis, Missouri

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Anders procedure is merely one method of satisfying the requirements of the Constitution for indigent criminal appeals
• holding that Anders is a prophylactic measure and that states may adopt alternative approaches as long as those approaches meet constitutional standards
• holding that Anders is a prophylactic measure and that states may adopt alternative approaches as long as those approaches meet constitutional standards
• holding that “the proper standard for evaluating [a] claim that appellate counsel was ineffective ... is that enunciated in Strickland”
• holding that \the proper standard for evaluating [a] claim that appellate counsel was ineffective ... is that enunciated in Strickland \
• holding that “the proper standard for evaluating [a] claim that appellate counsel was ineffective . . . is that enunciated in Strickland”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).