Skip to main content
· 3/28/1995

Janice Silverman v. Eastrich Multiple Investor Fund, L.P

Citations

  • 51 F.3d 28
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6201
  • 1995 WL 131378

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that right to use ECOA as a defense applied to mortgage foreclosure action
  • A statute “should be construed so that effect is given to all its provisions, so that no part will be inoperative or superfluous, void or insignificant.”
  • “The mandatory compliance daté should not be misconstrued as the effective date of the revisions.”
  • “The mandatory compliance date should not be misconstrued as the effective date of the revisions.”
  • \Congress . . . intended that creditors not affirmatively benefit from proscribed acts of credit discrimination\
  • A statute “should be construed so that effect is given to all its provisions, so that no part will be inoperative or superfluous, void or insignificant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scirica, Roth, Sarokin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.