Janice Freed v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a recipient of federal funding cannot be sued for a violation of § 791
• noting that “[e]very court of appeals to have addressed this question has already held that plaintiffs suing private recipients of federal funds under [§ 794 of the Rehabilitation Act] do not need to exhaust Title VI administrative remedies” (citations omitted)
• “persons can sue a federal employer for injunctive relief and/or damages for violating section 501 [of the Rehab Act] but are required to exhaust administrative remedies.”
• “[W]e are presented with the narrow issue whether a plaintiff suing solely under section 504 must exhaust the Title VI administrative process before bringing suit against a private recipient of federal funds.”
• “Every court of appeals to have addressed the question has already held that plaintiffs suing private recipients of federal funds under Section 504 do not need to exhaust Title VI administrative remedies.”
• “Every court of appeals to have addressed the question has already held that plaintiffs suing private recipients of federal funds under Section 504 do not need to exhaust Title VI administrative remedies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).