Jang v. Boston Scientific Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• resolving claim con- struction issues “that do not actually affect the infringe- ment controversy between the parties” would result in an impermissible advisory opinion
• resolving claim con- struction issues “that do not actually affect the infringe- ment controversy between the parties” would result in an impermissible advisory opinion
• “[W]e would risk rendering an advisory opinion as to claim construction issues that do not actually affect the infringement controversy between the parties.”
• “The Courts of Appeals in general and our court in particular have recognized that a remand for clarification is appropriate where a judgment is ambig uous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).