Janex Corp. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding significant the fact that nowhere on the package was the merchandise referred to as a “doll,” and consequently finding the article to be more than a doll.
• plastic Raggedy Ann/Andy with enclosed light
• not reported in Federal Supplement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Springs Creative Prods. Grp. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2013-08-16
• G.G. Marck & Assocs., Inc. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2015-06-17
• New York Merchandise Co. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 1981-03-12
• House of Ideas, Inc. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 1981-08-11
• Nadel & Sons Toy Corp. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 1982-07-15
• Dan-Dee Imports, Inc. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 1984-04-30
• Clairol, Inc. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 1984-06-21
• Dan-Dee Imports, Inc. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 1986-01-03
• House of Lloyd, Inc. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 1989-05-18
• Jing Mei Automotive (USA) v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 2023-12-18

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Kaufman & Vlnson Co. v. United States
  U.S. Customs Court· 1960-05-24· cited 25×
• Astra Trading Corp. v. United States
  U.S. Customs Court· 1966-06-06· cited 25×
• Englishtown Corp. v. United States
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1977-04-21· cited 20×
• Clutsom Machines, Inc. v. United States
  U.S. Customs Court· 1948-07-29· cited 15×
• V. Alexander & Co. v. United States
  U.S. Customs Court· 1967-12-04· cited 15×
• Russ Berrie & Co., Inc. v. United States
  U.S. Customs Court· 1976-06-24· cited 14×
• United States v. Oxford International Corp.
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1975-06-26· cited 14×
• United-Carr Fastener Corp. v. United States
  U.S. Customs Court· 1966-04-06· cited 13×
• Durbrow & Hearne Manufacturing Co. v. United States
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1919-04-15· cited 11×
• Louis Wolf & Co. v. United States
  U.S. Customs Court· 1945-11-09· cited 11×
• A. Tanzi Engineering Co. v. United States
  U.S. Customs Court· 1952-12-23· cited 10×
• Ashflash Corp. v. United States
  U.S. Customs Court· 1976-03-30· cited 9×
• Barum Co. v. United States
  U.S. Customs Court· 1953-04-08· cited 9×
• American Import Co. v. United States
  U.S. Customs Court· 1949-02-09· cited 7×
• United States v. Mobay Chemical Corp.
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1978-05-18· cited 5×
• Gold-Silver v. United States
  U.S. Customs Court· 1955-09-29· cited 4×
• Brechner Bros. v. United States
  U.S. Customs Court· 1967-04-13· cited 4×
• Amico, Inc. v. United States
  U.S. Customs Court· 1973-12-26· cited 4×
• Prestigeline v. United States
  U.S. Customs Court· 1975-12-12· cited 4×
• Sherriff-Guerringue, Inc. v. United States
  U.S. Customs Court· 1969-06-24· cited 3×