Skip to main content
· 7/15/1999

Janet Martin Klein v. Stahl Gmbh & Co., Maschinefabrik and Heidelberg Usa, Successor-In-Interest to Heidelberg Eastern, Inc.

Citations

  • 185 F.3d 98
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 16047
  • 1999 WL 498053

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Judicial estoppel is [but] one arrow in the quiver of sanctions at a court's disposal.\
  • “Judicial estoppel is [but] one arrow in the quiver of sanctions at a court’s disposal.”
  • “A court choosing among [inherent power] sanctions must ‘ensure that the sanction is tailored to address the harm identified.’”
  • “When the Rules or pertinent statutes are ‘up to the task,’ they should be used.”
  • “Judicial estoppel is . . . a defensive weapon loosed to protect the integrity of the court’s processes . . . . A trial court should avail itself of its inherent sanctioning powers only when absolutely necessary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greenberg, Roth, Pollak

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.