Janet Lashar Eppel v. Christopher James Eppel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the arbitrator’s findings of fact are immune from review altogether[]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Washington v. Washington
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2009-05-12· cited 123×
• Stoudemire v. Stoudemire
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2002-01-25· cited 46×
• Miller v. Miller
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2005-12-28· cited 45×
• Cipriano v. Cipriano
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2010-08-10· cited 42×

Other cases named Janet Lashar Eppel v. Christopher James Eppel

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Janet Lashar Eppel v. Christopher James Eppel
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2018-01-09
• Janet Lashar Eppel v. Christopher James Eppel
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2018-01-09
• Janet Lashar Eppel v. Christopher James Eppel
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2018-01-09