Janet Klein v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Presumably the court believed that Klein’s suspensions for rudeness, failure to help a patient and “performance problems” related to the quality of her work.
• Salary deductions made pursuant to an employer’s discipline policy may not be remedied by the window of correction
• ‘“Subject to reduction’ does not mean that a reduction was actually made. The plain meaning of the language suggests that it is enough that a deduction could have been made for an impermissible reason.”
• “when the regulation's interpretations state that a salaried employee's pay ‘is not subject to reduction because of variations in the quality or quantity of the work performed,’ 29 C.F.R. § 541.118(a
• “ ‘Subject to reduction’ does not mean that a reduc- tion was actually made. The plain meaning of the language suggests that it is enough that a deduction could have been made for an impermissible reason.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).