Skip to main content
· 9/24/2003

Janet D. Krizek v. Cigna Group Insurance

Citations

  • 345 F.3d 91
  • 31 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2681
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 19745
  • 2003 WL 22196605

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that subjective complaints of pain, even without physical findings or a particular diagnosis, were not legally insufficient evidence of disability
  • “[District courts [should] resolve the conflict issue in advance and, only upon finding ‘good cause,’ permit the parties to introduce evidence beyond the administrative record.”
  • “A district judge may expand its review of an administrative decision beyond the record in front of the claims administrator upon finding good cause warranting the introduction of additional evidence.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “A district judge may expand its review of an administrative decision beyond the record in front of the claims administrator upon finding good cause warranting the introduction of additional evidence.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winter, Calabresi, Katzmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.