Janes v. Washburn Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• abstention is not acquiescence where “there is no reason to think that any protest by her would have been effectual.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pavlidis v. New England Patriots Football Club, Inc.
  D. Massachusetts· 1987-04-10· cited 5×
• Kent v. Water Commissioners of the Barnstable Fire District
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1959-05-04· cited 4×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Calkins v. Wire Hardware Co.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1929-04-06· cited 70×
• Uccello v. Gold'n Foods, Inc.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1950-02-08· cited 32×
• Moseley v. Briggs Realty Co.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1946-10-03· cited 32×
• Norton v. Chioda
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1945-01-02· cited 30×
• Carter v. Sullivan
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1932-12-05· cited 29×
• Page v. Whittenton Manufacturing Co.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1912-03-08· cited 24×
• Lee v. Fisk
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1915-10-13· cited 22×
• Willson v. Laconia Cab Co.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1931-05-26· cited 22×
• Crocker v. Waltham Watch Co.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1944-02-01· cited 21×
• Thomas v. Laconia Car Co.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1925-02-28· cited 19×
• Joslin v. Boston & Maine Railroad
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1931-02-25· cited 19×