Janes v. Throckmorton
Citations
- 57 Cal. 368
Syllabus
<p>Tbust—Equitable Conveesion of Peopeety—Pbobatb Sale — Estates of Deceased Pebsons—Paeties—Beal Peopeety—Definition.—E. conveyed land to the defendant, who, at the same time, covenanted in writing that he would sell enough of the land to pay off the incumbrances thereon, and account with S. and M.—children of E.—for one-fifth of the moneys remaining on hand from sales of the land, after paying the incumbrances; and also that he would sell all the lands within three years, or at his option convey to S. and M. one-fifth of all the lands remaining on hand after paying the said debts and expenses. Afterwards, a mortgage upon a portion of the land having been foreclosed, and the land sold and conveyed by the sheriff, the defendant, under the circumstances stated in the opinion, obtained a conveyance from the purchaser. The interests and rights of S. and M. under the covenant having afterwards become vested, by proper mesne conveyances, in J., were after his death sold by his administrator, under an order of the Probate Court, as personal property. Held, in an action by the heirs of J.: (1) That the defendant took the land in trust for S. and M. to the extent of the rights reserved to them in the covenant; and to that extent they had an equitable interest in the land; that the deed and covenant did not work an equitable conversion of the land into personal property; and that the sale of this interest by the administrator as personal property was therefore void; (2) that the title obtained by the defendant from the purchaser at the foreclosure sale inured to the benefit of his aestuis que trust to the extent of their rights under the covenant; (3) that the action was properly brought by the heirs of J.; and (4) that, in view of the fact that the record failed to show any notice on the cestuis que trustent of an adverse holding by the trustee, the defense of the Statute of Limitations could not be maintained.</p> <p>Id.—Equitable Conveesion of Peopeety.—To constitute a co
Judges: Ross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. NorthropSupreme Court of Florida· 1892-06-15· cited 49×
- Robertson v. BurrellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-12-23· cited 42×
- Estate of KayCalifornia Supreme Court· 1947-06-02· cited 38×
- Roach v. CaraffaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-09-04· cited 27×
- Fox v. TayCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-05-30· cited 23×
- Deschamps v. DeschampsMontana Supreme Court· 1922-11-27· cited 22×
- Swisher v. SwisherSupreme Court of Iowa· 1912-10-25· cited 20×
- Reclamation District No. 3 v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1884-09-30· cited 18×
- Adams v. LambardCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-09-05· cited 15×
- Field v. AndradaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-02-16· cited 15×
- In Re McGovern's EstateMontana Supreme Court· 1926-10-16· cited 14×
- Wright v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1939-10-23· cited 10×
- Elder v. Horseshoe Mining and Milling Co.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1897-05-06· cited 9×
- Holmes v. TennantTexas Commission of Appeals· 1921-06-01· cited 8×
- McClure v. ColyearCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-09-03· cited 6×
- Kay v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1947-06-02· cited 5×
- Felkner v. DoolyUtah Supreme Court· 1904-11-04· cited 4×
- Wilson v. StoudamireCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1943-09-30· cited 3×
- Boydstun v. JacobsNevada Supreme Court· 1915-01-15· cited 3×
- Southwestern Investment Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1946-01-28· cited 2×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Van Epps v. Van EppsNew York Court of Chancery· 1841-07-20· cited 88×
- Beckett v. SeloverCalifornia Supreme Court· 1857-07-01· cited 65×
- Haynes v. MeeksCalifornia Supreme Court· 1862-07-01· cited 42×
- Andrews v. Hobson's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama· 1853-06-15· cited 29×
- Hearst v. PujolCalifornia Supreme Court· 1872-07-01· cited 15×
- Thompson v. FeltonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1880-07-01· cited 15×
- Lynn v. GephartCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1867-07-19· cited 15×
- Kennedy v. NunanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1877-07-01· cited 11×
- Pratt v. ThorntonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1848-05-15· cited 9×
- Joor v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court· 1860-04-15· cited 5×
- Johnson v. FleetNew York Supreme Court· 1835-10-15· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.