Skip to main content
· 1/22/1988

Janeral L. Holley, Cross-Appellee v. Northrop Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc., Cross-Appellant

Citations

  • 835 F.2d 1375
  • 28 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 932
  • 10 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 459
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 554
  • 1988 WL 144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing appeal from denial of summary judgment from ease where the appellant made a motion for directed verdict and then for judgment notwithstanding the verdict at trial
  • \[A] party may not rely on the undeveloped state of the facts at the time [the party] moves for summary judgment to undermine a fully-developed set of trial facts which militate against [the party's] case.\
  • “[T]he movant must establish the fraud by clear and convincing evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hill, Fay, Allgood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.