· 1/22/1988
Janeral L. Holley, Cross-Appellee v. Northrop Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc., Cross-Appellant
Citations
- 835 F.2d 1375
- 28 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 932
- 10 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 459
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 554
- 1988 WL 144
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing appeal from denial of summary judgment from ease where the appellant made a motion for directed verdict and then for judgment notwithstanding the verdict at trial
- \[A] party may not rely on the undeveloped state of the facts at the time [the party] moves for summary judgment to undermine a fully-developed set of trial facts which militate against [the party's] case.\
- “[T]he movant must establish the fraud by clear and convincing evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hill, Fay, Allgood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.