Janeiro v. Urological Surgery Professional Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it is unnecessary “to find that defendants acted with an especially high degree of culpability”
• stating that it is unnecessary \to find that defendants acted with an especially high degree of culpability\
• explaining that, following a bench trial, “if the trial court’s reading of the record [with respect to an actor’s motivation] is plausible, appellate review is at an end”
• “[I]f the trial court’s reading of the record [with respect to an actor’s motivation] is plausible, appellate review is at an end.” (second alteration in original) (quoting Smith v. F.W. Morse & Co., 76 F.3d 413, 420 (1st Cir. 1996))
• \[N]o single factor is dispositive . . . .\
• benefits award already depleted the Plan’s assets substantially

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).