· 6/20/2005
JANE TATUM, — v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, a PUBLIC BODY CORPORATE, —
Citations
- 411 F.3d 955
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 11745
- 95 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1697
- 2005 WL 1421689
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting constructive discharge claim where the plaintiff “was forced to work in the same office as [her harasser], [but] she presented no evidence of any further harassment or inappropriate behavior” in the roughly two months preceding her resignation
- where (1) plaintiff’s direct supervisor took no action in response to plaintiff’s initial complaint of improper advances; (2
- even though investigation took eight weeks, employer satisfied remedial action requirement without disciplining alleged harasser because it investigated and no further harassment occurred
- even though investigation took eight weeks, employer satisfied remedial action requirement without disciplining alleged harasser because it investigated and no further harassment occurred
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Loken, Hansen, Melloy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.