Skip to main content
· 6/20/2005

JANE TATUM, — v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, a PUBLIC BODY CORPORATE, —

Citations

  • 411 F.3d 955
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 11745
  • 95 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1697
  • 2005 WL 1421689

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting constructive discharge claim where the plaintiff “was forced to work in the same office as [her harasser], [but] she presented no evidence of any further harassment or inappropriate behavior” in the roughly two months preceding her resignation
  • where (1) plaintiff’s direct supervisor took no action in response to plaintiff’s initial complaint of improper advances; (2
  • even though investigation took eight weeks, employer satisfied remedial action requirement without disciplining alleged harasser because it investigated and no further harassment occurred
  • even though investigation took eight weeks, employer satisfied remedial action requirement without disciplining alleged harasser because it investigated and no further harassment occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Hansen, Melloy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.