Jane M. Wooldridge v. Marlene Industries Corporation and Russell Sportswear Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remarking that “[a] district court should state with some particularity which of the claimed hours the court is rejecting, which it is accepting, and why”
• remarking that “[a] district court should state with some particularity which of the claimed hours the court is rejecting, which it is accepting, and why”
• “A district court should state with some particularity which of the claimed hours the court is rejecting, which it is accepting, and why.”
• abrogated on other grounds by Buckhannon Bd. & Care Home, Inc. v. W. Va. Dept. of Health & Human Res., 532 U.S. 598 (2001)
• abrogated on other grounds Buckhannon Bd. & Care Home, Inc. v. W. Va. Dep’t of Health & Human Resources, 532 U.S. 598 (2001)
• abrogated on other grounds by Buckhannon Bd. & Care Home, Inc. v. W. Va. Dep’t of Health & Human Resources, 532 U.S. 598 (2001)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).