Jane M. WOOLDRIDGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARLENE INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant bears burden of demonstrating \by a preponderance of the evidence that factors other than the condemned discrimination caused the decision of which claimant complains\
• holding that defendant bears burden of demonstrating “by a preponderance of the evidence that factors other than the condemned discrimination caused the decision of which claimant complains”
• holding that defendant bears burden of demonstrating “by a preponderance of the evidence that factors other than the condemned discrimination caused the decision of which claimant complains”
• stating that the district court should review the special master’s findings of fact and conclusions of law under the clearly erroneous standard
• stating that the district court should review the special master's findings of fact and conclusions of law under the clearly erroneous standard
• finding support for special master’s verbatim adoption of a defendant’s proposed Findings and Conclusions because “all parties had equal opportunity to submit proposed reports for the special master’s consideration and did so”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).