Skip to main content
· 1/31/1996

Jane Donaho v. Fmc Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, as Plan Administrator of the Fmc Long-Term Disability Plan

Citations

  • 74 F.3d 894
  • 19 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2537
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 1205
  • 1996 WL 34483

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “ ‘substantial evidence’ is only a quantified reformulation of reasonableness” in cases involving the plan administrator’s evaluation of the facts to determine plan application
  • concluding that “ ‘substantial evidence’ is only a quantified reformulation of reasonableness” in cases involving the plan administrator’s evaluation of the facts to determine plan application
  • concluding that “ ‘substantial evidence’ is only a quantified reformulation of reasonableness” in cases involving the plan administrator’s evaluation of the facts to determine plan application
  • where decision lacks record support or evidence in support does not ring true and is overwhelmed by contrary evidence, administrator’s decision is unreasonable
  • where decision lacks record support or evidence in support does not ring true and is overwhelmed by contrary evidence, administrator’s decision is unreasonable
  • \This is not a case where the plan administrator's decision is overwhelmed by contrary evidence.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Gibson, Bright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.