Jane Doe v. Usdc-Nvl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that emotional distress constituted concrete injury sufficient to establish standing to sue under the Truth in Lending Act
• holding that, at the summary judgment stage, deposition testimony describing “emotional distress is sufficient evidence of [that injury]” to establish standing
• noting that with a Truth in Lending Act claim, the plaintiff’s evidence that he “lost time, money and peace” were “garden-variety injuries in fact under Article III”
• finding “deposition testimony describing [plaintiff’s] lost time, economic harm, and emotional distress” was sufficient to survive summary judgment
• “[The plaintiff] must establish that his wasted time, financial harm, and emotional distress are traceable to [the defendant’s] alleged [Truth in Lending Act] violation.”
• “Walters’s deposi- tion testimony describing his lost time, economic harm, and emo- tional distress is sufficient evidence . . . to survive summary judg- ment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).