Jane Doe v. Rosenberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming for “substantially the reasons set forth in the district court’s comprehensive and scholarly opinion”
• involuntary hospitalization and medication was “not traditionally within the exclusive prerogative of the state,” and the other tests for state action were also not satisfied
• “On the question of whether the defendants acted under color of state law, we affirm for substantially the reasons set forth in the district court’s comprehensive and scholarly opinion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).