Jane Doe v. John Roe, and Roe and Roe, Limited

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “Doe’s loss of earnings ... are plainly derivatives of her emotional distress — and therefore reflect personal injuries which are not compensable under RICO”
• holding that “Doe’s loss of earnings . . . are plainly derivatives of her emotional distress—and therefore reflect personal injuries which are not compensable under RICO”
• acknowledging that economic aspects of personal injuries could, “as a theoretical matter,” be viewed as injury to business or property
• finding that loss of earnings, purchase of a new security system, and employment of a new attorney were derivative of emotional distress resulting from defendant’s sexual encounters with plaintiff and therefore reflected personal injuries that were not compensable under RICO
• finding that loss of earnings, purchase of a new security system, and employment of a new attorney were derivative of emotional distress resulting from defendant's sexual encounters with plaintiff and therefore reflected personal injuries that were not compensable under RICO
• rejecting the idea that extortion of sexual favors from the plaintiff was injury to “business or property” for purposes of private civil RICO action, even if sexual favors resulted in reduction of debt claimed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).