Skip to main content
· 12/22/2004

Jane Doe v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.

Citations

  • 394 F.3d 891
  • 2005 A.M.C. 214
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 26743
  • 2004 WL 2955003

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \a party cannot assert grounds in the renewed motion that it did not raise in the earlier motion\ to prevent the \sandbag[ging]\ of opposing counsel
  • holding that a post- trial motion for judgment can be granted only on grounds advanced in a pre-verdict motion
  • holding that maritime law governed a sexual assault claim, even though the assault occurred while the ship was docked
  • holding that the defendants - a group including the cruise line and its third-party service providers - owed \a non-delegable duty to protect their passengers\ from crewmember assaults
  • holding that federal maritime law governed a cruise passenger’s sexual assault case against a cruise ship even though the assault took place while the ship was docked in Bermuda
  • noting that the jury awarded $1 million in compensatory damages to a sexual battery victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hull, Marcus, Mills

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.