Skip to main content
· 8/15/2023

Jane Doe v. Board of Trustees of the Nebraska State Colleges

Citations

  • 78 F.4th 419

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that protected speech may not be abridged or censored short of “a clear and present danger of a serious substantive evil that rises far above public inconvenience, annoyance, or unrest”
  • holding that reversal of a conviction is required where “one part of the statute was unconstitutional and it could not be determined that the defendant was not convicted under that part”
  • noting that \[a]s construed and applied [the provision] at least contains parts that are unconstitutional\ (emphasis added)
  • noting that the defendant \maintained at all times that the ordinance as applied to his conduct violated his right of free speech ...\ (emphasis added)
  • noting that “[a]s construed and applied [the provision] at least contains parts that are unconstitutional” (emphasis added)
  • noting that the defendant “maintained at all times that the ordinance as applied to his conduct violated his right of free speech . . (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.