· 8/15/2023
Jane Doe v. Board of Trustees of the Nebraska State Colleges
Citations
- 78 F.4th 419
Oral argument
- ListenArgued33 min recording
Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that protected speech may not be abridged or censored short of “a clear and present danger of a serious substantive evil that rises far above public inconvenience, annoyance, or unrest”
- holding that reversal of a conviction is required where “one part of the statute was unconstitutional and it could not be determined that the defendant was not convicted under that part”
- noting that \[a]s construed and applied [the provision] at least contains parts that are unconstitutional\ (emphasis added)
- noting that the defendant \maintained at all times that the ordinance as applied to his conduct violated his right of free speech ...\ (emphasis added)
- noting that “[a]s construed and applied [the provision] at least contains parts that are unconstitutional” (emphasis added)
- noting that the defendant “maintained at all times that the ordinance as applied to his conduct violated his right of free speech . . (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.