JANE DOE v. BERNABEI & WACHTEL, PLLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s publication of a video depicting the plaintiff being assaulted along with her full name did not meet the outrageousness standard
• noting that the District of Columbia has adopted the Restatement articulation of invasion of privacy torts, including false light
• noting that “courts have been reluctant to impose a duty to avoid negligent infliction of emotional distress to clients even upon the attorneys who represent them”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).