Jane Doe, Richard Roe, and Edward T. Stein v. The County of Montgomery, Illinois, a Body Politic and Corporate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a lawyer did not have standing to challenge a religious display in a courthouse where the lawyer had not alleged that he would have any contact with the display
• holding that a lawyer did not have standing to chal- lenge a religious display in a courthouse where the lawyer had not alleged that he would have any contact with the display
• holding that a lawyer did not have standing to chal- lenge a religious display in a courthouse where the lawyer had not alleged that he would have any contact with the display
• upholding the standing of two plaintiffs while affirming the district court’s dismissal of the third plaintiff's complaint for lack of standing
• treating holdings on merits in Supreme Court’s establishment clause cases as holdings that plaintiffs in those cases had standing
• rejecting the argument that “unless a plaintiff assumes a ‘special burden’ or alters his behavior because of the religious message” he lacks standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).