Skip to main content
· 1/12/1989

Jane DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 865 F.2d 864
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 520
  • 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,616
  • 48 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1305
  • 1989 WL 3956

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We fail to see how a document which clearly disclaims in unambiguous language any purpose to bind the parties can constitute ‘a promise clear enough that an employee would reasonably believe that an offer has been made.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Coffey, Flaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.