Skip to main content
· 2/12/2009

Jane Doe No. 5 v. Epstein

Citations

  • 611 F. Supp. 2d 1339
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15427
  • 2009 WL 383383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying motion to dismiss battery and sexual assault claims and rejecting defendant’s argument that plaintiff failed to allege “the specific facts” as to what was done to the plaintiff, and what defendant said and did to create fear and apprehension to the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kenneth A. Marra

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.