Skip to main content
· 3/21/2025

Jane Doe I & II; And John Doe... v. Shaunice Warr

Citations

  • 566 P.3d 342

Syllabus

Did the superior court err in concluding as a matter of law that Shaunice Warr (1) had no common law \duty to report\ the sexual abuse suffered by the Does, minor children at the time of the abuse, and (2) was not a mandatory reporter under A.R.S. § 13-3620?

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.