Skip to main content
· 9/23/1991

Jane Butler Knapp v. Dow Corning Corporation

Citations

  • 941 F.2d 1336
  • 20 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1148
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 22156
  • 1991 WL 170201

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[w]hile we adhere to a liberal standard respecting amendments to a timely-filed Rule 59 motion, we are without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal of Knapp’s tardy submission”
  • “[Fjailure to file a notice of appeal essentially forecloses [this court’s] consideration of the merits of [the] case.”
  • “[F]ailure to file a notice of appeal essentially forecloses [this court’s] consideration of the merits of [the] case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, King, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.