· 9/23/1991
Jane Butler Knapp v. Dow Corning Corporation
Citations
- 941 F.2d 1336
- 20 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1148
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 22156
- 1991 WL 170201
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[w]hile we adhere to a liberal standard respecting amendments to a timely-filed Rule 59 motion, we are without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal of Knapp’s tardy submission”
- “[Fjailure to file a notice of appeal essentially forecloses [this court’s] consideration of the merits of [the] case.”
- “[F]ailure to file a notice of appeal essentially forecloses [this court’s] consideration of the merits of [the] case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Politz, King, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.