· 8/12/1981
Jandak v. Village of Brookfield
Citations
- 520 F. Supp. 815
- 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14176
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that wiretapping of an officer’s private communications made on a line of which he had notice was subject to routine recording did not violate Title III
- explaining that the telephone equipment exception extends beyond those basic instruments necessary to complete a telephone call
- “There is little doubt that Congress did not intend the statute to apply to routine recording of emergency and investigative calls as an integral component of a police station telephone system.”
- party to conversation assumes risk that other party will consent to its recording
- party to conversation assumes risk that other party will consent to its recording
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Leighton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.