Skip to main content
· 8/12/1981

Jandak v. Village of Brookfield

Citations

  • 520 F. Supp. 815
  • 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that wiretapping of an officer’s private communications made on a line of which he had notice was subject to routine recording did not violate Title III
  • explaining that the telephone equipment exception extends beyond those basic instruments necessary to complete a telephone call
  • “There is little doubt that Congress did not intend the statute to apply to routine recording of emergency and investigative calls as an integral component of a police station telephone system.”
  • party to conversation assumes risk that other party will consent to its recording
  • party to conversation assumes risk that other party will consent to its recording

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leighton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.