Janda v. Janda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Under long-standing Alabama caselaw, a court may annul a marriage because of fraudulent inducement going to the essence of the marriage relation.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In the Matter of Paula Geraghty and Kenneth Geraghty
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2016-10-20· cited 27×
• 1568 Montgomery Highway, Inc. v. City of Hoover
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2010-03-05· cited 7×
• Smith v. Cahill
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2013-04-19· cited 2×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Marriage of Liu
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-12-18· cited 44×
• Mall, Inc. v. Robbins
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1982-02-19· cited 42×
• Anders v. Anders
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1916-06-21· cited 28×
• Howard v. Pike
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1973-04-05· cited 19×
• Meagher v. Maleki
  California Court of Appeal· 2005-07-18· cited 12×
• Bishop v. Bishop
  New York Supreme Court· 1970-03-25· cited 12×
• Bracewell v. Bryan
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1976-03-31· cited 10×
• Gatto v. Gatto
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1919-03-04· cited 9×
• V.J.S. v. M.J.B.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-04-30· cited 7×
• State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Borden
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1979-05-18· cited 6×
• Parks v. Martinson
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1997-01-10· cited 5×
• Williams v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1958-10-09· cited 1×