Jana L. Morton v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the mere existence of government safety standard did not demonstrate UPS’s business necessity defense and fact issues precluded summary judgment
• holding that the mere existence of government safety standard did not demonstrate UPS's business necessity defense and fact issues precluded summary judgment
• holding that the mere existence of government safety standard did not demon- strate UPS’s business necessity defense and fact issues pre- cluded summary judgment
• explaining that summary judgement is available only where there is no genuine dispute that the employer has engaged in the interactive process in good faith
• explaining that summary judgement is available only where there is no genuine dispute that the employer has engaged in the interactive process in good faith
• “The question whether this failure should be excused because there would in any event have been no reasonable accommodation available is one as to which the employer, not the employee, should bear the burden of persuasion throughout the litigation.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).