Jan v. Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that demand was futile based on allegation that the directors were “interested in the outcome of the litigation because each one face[d] a substantial likelihood of liability”
• \Simply being members of the board or the compensation committee and participating in the decision-making do not suffice\ to excuse demand.
• the defendant directors' participation in the issuance of allegedly false statements did not excuse demand
• \Simply being members of the board or the compensation committee and participating in the decision-making do not suffice\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).