Jan Johnson v. Multnomah County, Oregon, a Political Subdivision of State of Oregon William McKinley Paul Yarborough

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that recklessness of expression may be considered in the Pickering balance, but that the public employer must make a showing of actual injury
• holding that recklessness of expression may be considered in the Pickering balance, but that the public employer must make a showing of actual injury
• stating that, in the Pickering balance, courts may consider the \actual damage done to the government by the reckless statement\
• stating that, in the Pickering balance, courts may consider the “actual damage done to the government by the reckless statement”
• finding that county employee’s criticism of her supervisor as part of the “good old boy network” involved in misconduct and mismanagement was speech on a matter of public concern, even though there was evidence that the employee was personally “embittered”
• government employee retaliated against for publicly accusing her boss of running a “good old boy network” can bring a First Amendment claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).