Jamison v. People

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting ex post facto challenge to sex offender registration requirement where conviction occurred prior to enactment of registration requirement
• “[R]egistration is required in order to aid law enforcement officials in investigating future sex crimes and to protect the public safety.”
• intent of statute remedial, not punitive
• law not ex post facto

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).