Jamison v. Klem

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that at a plea colloquy the defendant must be told about the possible direct consequences of his plea, including the mandatory minimum sentence he faces
• noting that if a Supreme Court decision must precisely resolve a given issue under AEDPA, only the “contrary to” 21 standard would exist, and the “unreasonable application” standard would be rendered meaningless
• the “unreasonable application” standard is not meaningless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).