Jamison v. Crowley Marine Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the records of six treating providers “highly probative” where “[e]ach provider observed how the same conditions affected plaintiff, and no provider concluded that he was capable of returning to work”
• FCE found reliable in part because its measurements were corroborated by “results of similar tests” performed earlier
• “The Court is not persuaded by defendant’s arguments concerning ‘time concurrent’ evidence, because the Policy contains no requirement that records be ‘time concurrent,’ nor does it require that particular tests be performed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).