Skip to main content
· 1/15/1859

Jamison v. Bridge

Citations

  • 14 La. Ann. 31

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a missing videotape was unimportant when testimony provided an adequate description
  • missing defense videotape of car interior found insubstantial, because the interior of the car was portrayed in the record by other means
  • subject of missing videotape was “portrayed in the record by means other” than the videotape

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.