Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
· 6/4/1986

Jamie K. Thomas v. Internorth, Inc.

Citations

  • 790 F.2d 1253
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 25696

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The abrogation of the no-duty rule does not relieve a plaintiff from proving that the defendant had a duty and breached it.\
  • “The abrogation of the no-duty rule does not relieve a plaintiff from proving that the defendant had a duty and breached it.”
  • A The abrogation of the no‑duty rule does not relieve a plaintiff from proving that the defendant had a duty and breached it. @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wisdom, Rubin, Higgin-Botham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.