Skip to main content
· 2/24/2016

Jamie Grant v. State of Florida

Citations

  • 189 So. 3d 878
  • 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2726
  • 2016 WL 717961

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing Jose and explaining “the defendant was required to file a petition to modify the supplemental restitution orders” because the amount of restitution was not final
  • stating a defendant may appeal a restitution order, including a district court’s failure to determine his or her ability to pay when “the plan of restitution and the restitution plan of payment were part of the sentencing order”
  • “[B]efore ordering payment for court- appointed attorney fees and court costs, the court must consider the defendant’s ability to pay.”
  • “A defendant’s reasonable ability to pay is a constitutional prerequisite for a criminal restitution order such as that provided by Iowa Code chapter 910.”
  • “[T]he court determined [the defendant] was able to pay the jail fees without knowing what the amount of those costs were. The court abused its discretion in so doing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.