Skip to main content
· 5/7/2024

Jamie Allen Harless v. Kenneth E. Nicely

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that section 251’s “error” requirement covers “inadvertence or mistake,” not “deliberate” choices made by the patentee
  • explaining that section 251’s “error” requirement covers “inadvertence or mis- take,” not “deliberate” choices made by the patentee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.