Jamie Adaire v. Carolyn Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the ALJ had made “the fundamental error that ‘subjective’ statements are to be given zero weight”
• explaining that an ALJ may not discount or ignore subjective complaints of pain solely because they were not be substantiated by objective medical evidence
• noting that ALJs may not discount pain testimony that cannot be attributed to “objective” injuries or illnesses—the kind revealed by x-rays
• finding that a “recurrent error made by the Social Security Administration’s administrative law judges” is the conclusion that disabling symptoms must be substantiated by particular “objective” testing
• finding that a “recurrent error made by the Social Security Administration’s administrative law judges” is the conclusion that disabling symptoms must be substantiated by particular “objective” testing
• finding that a “recurrent error made by the Social Security Administration’s administrative law judges” is the conclusion 21 that disabling symptoms must be substantiated by particular “objective” testing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).