Jamice Carey v. Hector Crescenzi, Armando Crescenzi and Harenzy Realty Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that nonmovant’s “implausible claim” consisting of “bald assertion, completely unsupported by evidence,” did not present “sufficient disagreement to require submission to a jury”
• finding insufficient a “bald assertion, completely unsupported by evidence,” that a father who was the record owner of property was not also the beneficial owner at the time he transferred it to his sons
• rejecting the notion that a presumption of intentional fraud exists under § 276-a
• finding the claim that an individual’s “name was on the deed solely as an accommodation,” unsupported by further evidence, insufficient to create a genuine dispute with respect to an interest in real property
• an entity World ins. Co. v. Stack Oil, Inc., 922 F.2d 118, 121 Qd that provides merged credit reports identical to the Cir.1990
• “The defendants’ bald assertion, completely unsupported by evidence, did not satisfy their burden; it certainly did not present a sufficient disagreement to require submission to the jury as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).